• Manifestation contre les massacres des Peulhs au Mali, Burkina, Niger, Guinée: Plus jamais ça

    Imprimer

    La communauté Peulhe présente à Genève, par le biais du collectif Baka Am Walla a organisé un rassemblement de soutien ce samedi à la place des Nations à 14h pour dénoncer les massacres perpétrés récemment des Peulhs au Mali, au Burkina, au Niger, au Guinée.

    DSC_0577.jpg
     
     

    Le 23 mars dernier, au moins 160 personnes, dont des femmes et des enfants, ont été massacrées à Ogossagou un village peulh, dans le centre du Mali.

    Depuis 2018 près de 1000 morts au Burkina, 1500 morts au Mali, des milles en Centre Afrique milliers d’expatriées en Guinée.

    La violence de ce massacre est indescriptible et si l’attaque n’a pour l’instant pas été revendiquée, pour les représentants de la communauté peulhe il ne fait aucun doute que les responsables sont des milices de chasseurs présumés dogons, proche du gouvernement.

    Cet acte contre le peuple peulh ne semble pas être isolé puisqu’au Burkina Faso, ou encore en Guinée, les peuls sont aussi victimes d’actes de violences.

    Pour rappel, les peulhs sont établis dans toute l’Afrique de l’Ouest dans une quinzaine de pays, principalement au Nigeria, au Niger, au Mali, au Cameroun, au Sénégal et en Guinée. Ils sont minoritaires dans la plupart de ces pays, et subissent des discriminations du fait de leur appartenance au peuple peulh.

    DSC_0511.jpgDSC_0513.jpgDSC_0519.jpgDSC_0531.jpgDSC_0533.jpgDSC_0536.jpgDSC_0551.jpgDSC_0556.jpgDSC_0560.jpgDSC_0574.jpgDSC_0581.jpgDSC_0584.jpgDSC_0585.jpg

     

    Tous droits réservés

    Aucune image ne peut être reproduite ou transmise, même partiellement, sous aucune forme, y compris l’illustration de pages web, sans avoir eu préalablement l’autorisation écrite de l’auteur. Toute violation pourra être poursuivie.
    Pour toute demande, merci de me contacter.

    www.photographygeneva.com  

    Lien permanent 1 commentaire
  • Nûri Mehmûd, YPG Spokesman : World Community should assume it’s responsibility. ISIS prisoners of war should be judged by an International Tribunal.

    Imprimer

    DEM_3002.jpg

    Question : Because I cannot speak Kurdish I have to conduct this interview in Turkish, for which I apologise.

    Mahmud : There is nothing wrong in communicating in Turkish as that is also the language of a nation. In Rojova Kurds, Arabs, Armenians, Turkmens, Circassians, everbody, talk in their own language freely. We respect differences and freedom here. We see them as wealth, our wealth. In this respect Rojova believes in freedom…

    Question : I would like to start with a topic which is also on the agenda of the West. How many ISIS militants and their families are in your prisons and in the camps under your control?

    Mahmud : We cannot give you an exact number these days as their surrender continues. The war in Bahoz is ongoing and thousands of ISIS members who participated in the foundation of ISIS continue to get out of there. Before we had identified more than 800 captives from 48 different countries. Today the number has increased even more. We have thousands of terorists from a lot of countries. With their families and children.  Again many surrendered in Bahoz yet none of them are Bahoz locals. All have settled there from outside regions. Only terorists and their families surrendered or were captured.

    Question : As you know most of the countries are not keen on taking any action about the captives you have and this has turned into an international crisis. A very serious situation indeed as they do not want to take any sort of responsibility for their citizens. How do you appraise this situation ? How do you intend to overcome this crisis?

    Mahmud : We were alone in fighting against this terror especially until Kobani. Following Kobani we collaborated with the international coalition in the fight against this terror. They stood by us. Except that until now, the international community has not fulfilled its responsibilities despite international law. We have terrorists who have been involved in acts of terror in Asia, in Europe and in the USA. We know that the ISIS terorists in our custody have international court cases.
     

    That is why this issue requires serious attention and international involvement. Most of the governments think of their national interests, rather than the benefits of their countries or peoples. At this point they are unable to put international regulations and laws into practice. We expect international forces to assume their responsibility in accordance with the framework of the alliance.

    Question : How many countries have applied for the return of their captured citizens until now ? Have any actually returned ?

    Mahmud : In the past some families came and, as YPG, we sent some individuals who were not involved in acts of terrorism back to their countries. Russia for instance took back some of its citizens. They were women and children. But until now no country has officially requested the return of their citizen terrorists.

    Question : Most of the countries have not claimed their ISIS member citizens. Why do you think they do not want to take these people into their country?

    Mahmud : To be honest the responsibility Rojova and Northern Syria has with regard to this problem is very heavy. Today everybody knows that we are at war against a form of terrorism which is a curse for the whole world. The International coalition took its place by our side in this war.
     

    However the political, economic and legal embargo against Rojava is unfortunately still in force. Up until now international forces have not established a relationship with legal scope towards Rojava and northern Syria. In this respect we have been left alone.
     

    The important issue of prisoners has been put on the shoulders of a community which has had a very hard time building itself up by its own means. Rojova and the Northern Syrian administration covers 32% of Syrian territory. These regions amount to 40% of the Syrian population. People who live here are also Syrian citizens. They need to form their own institutions in order to solve the problems they face. Here also international forces have important duties. I mean they should take control over the issue of ISIS prisoners of war and assume a role in solving this problem.
     

    Unfortunately, however, no positive action has been taken on this matter until today. Countries still think in terms of the interests of their governments. They do not want to take action for judging ISIS member citizens. They act on the basis of their own self interest.
     

    Most of the terrorists we have here are dangerous. If they ever get the chance to organize they would do the same thing again; as the wives of most of them have emphasized. These women declared that they would raise their children, and also the children of their children for this cause.
     

    Frankly the world has to learn its lesson and take its responsibility. For the sake of the future of their countries as well as for the future of their citizens. How this terror has come into existence and how it has come to this level should be analysed well, in all its aspects, psychologically, socially, etc.
     

    However, as we mentioned, governments act on behalf of their daily interests. They are not acting in accordance with existing international practices and their allied responsibilities.

    Question : There are claims that the prisoners in your custody are guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Where are these people? How, where and by which courts will they be judged ? Can you share your opinions and recommendations with us ?

    158A1787.jpg

    Mahmud : After the revolution in Syria, especially after the resurgence of nationalist or terrorist groups, communities became  organized, especially in Rojova cities. They discussed the kind of revolution they desired. At that time legislative and judicial institutions and constitutional (legal) councils were established in community centres. First in neighborhoods and villages, and later at the level of cantons. Today there is a constitution in Northern Syria. The community discusses and takes decisions at the communal level. Rojova and Northern Syrian courts act within this framework.
     

    In accordance with international law and the framework of the alliance these institutions act on behalf of human rights in the service of truth and humanity. In this respect our laws or the laws prevailing in Rojova constitute the Constitution of Northern Syria. In other words, the Canton of Kobani, the Canton of Cizire, the Rakka Civil Congress, the Tabka Civil Congress and the Deyrezor Civil Congress form a legal system within the Syrian Autonomous Administration.
     

    However, this is not sufficient. In order to judge terrorists in court we need international law practices. This is required for the condemnation of terorism. Our law system is a regional one. But these terrorists are terrorists of the world. They have undertaken acts of terrorism in Europe, Asia, the USA and in the Middle East and they have cases filed against them in various countries.
     

    This is why international law is needed. An International court is required so that they may receive fair judgement. The trials we have conducted are more like first base trials.
     

    However in order for the truth to emerge the world has to intervene. On financial, security, legal and moral grounds. To comfort the conscience of people who have suffered from international terrorism, like us, like people in Paris, Berlin, Washington and Moscow among others, the world has to take responsibility for the trial of these terrorists. 

    We do not want to put ourselves in the place of other victims and pass judgement. What we want is for the world to take responsibility. Therefore an international court where everyone can seek justice has to be established. This court will also acknowledge the victory won against ISIS.
     

    At the same time all parties have to assume legal, security, economic and ethical responsibility in this matter. In Northern Syria we defended everyone. This is why cooperation is required.  We have succeeded in ending terror.

    Question : An interesting situation indeed. Many countries in the world have capital punishment but there is no capital punishment in Rojova. Will thousands of people be given a fair defense? An organisation which has commited crimes against humanity will be tried. This will be the trial of the century perhaps. Do you have the sufficient conditions for an international court to be established here ? We are speaking of a court where thousands of people from different countries are to be judged.

    158A1474.jpg

    Mahmud : You are undoubtly right. This is exactly what we are talking about. We do not have sufficient resources to realize this. There is political, economic and legal embargo against Northern Syria. We are also subject to a diplomatic embargo. We are surrounded by the Syrian regime, Turkey, the Kurdistan Region and we are under their diplomatic embargo. All sides are closed to us and therefore Rojova and Northern Syria do not have sufficient facilities to judge these terrorists. Trials should comply with international law standards.

    We consider the courts we have as preliminary courts. Thus we appeal to the world to come forward. In order to resolve this issue we need to act jointly.

    In order to appease both our and the world’s conscience, and in order to render this terror meaningless, the international community needs to come together on this issue.
     

    Fascism, which pits people from one religion against another has to be counteracted. Such a trial can be the trial of the century in which the leaders who conducted the ISIS attack - just like the Mongol invasions of the past -  will be judged. It should be treated in accordance with its priority. Mongols and ISIS have similar moral characteristics. The world has to see this. The Northern Syrian administration is making huge sacrifices. This teror should be taken under control and prevented from reorganizing. They have the potential to reorganize. Only the cooperation of the world powers can prevent this.

    Question : The prisoners you hold, the prisoners of war, have some rights, some of these rights are carried out by your administration (accomodation, health, food, communication needs, etc) which require serious financial assistance. How do you do it? Do you get support from international organisations or have you applied for support from organisations such as the Red Cross or the Red Crescent?

    158A0771.jpg

    Mahmud : As I said before, communities should be able to form their institutions by their own means and abilities. In Rojova and Northern Syria these institutions were formed to solve their own economic, legal, and defense problems. They were sustained by their own strength. With the presence of these institutions we managed to control terrorism. However this is a very heavy burden for us to keep on bearing. These terrorists have health problems, they need rehabilitation because they are mentally ill. Their children have to be educated, they have to be prevented from growing up under their fathers’ culture.
     

    On the other hand there is also the legal side. We can’t keep them away from terrorism just by providing food for them. To this effect we are trying to build a relationship with the UN and the Red Cross but they are developing a  relationship with us via Syria. They do not establish a direct relationship with Northern Syria. They come to Northern Syria only if Damascus allows them. If  Damascus doesn’t then they don’t come. Institutions in Damascus are under the control of the Baas regime. Although 40% of the population lives in Northern Syria they do not benefit from any services. Only the Baas regime gets these services. All state institutions provide service for the Baas regime. International institutions only address Damascus. 

    Relationships need to be built with the communities in Northern Syria. However up until now this region has not been addressed directly. Their relationship with us is not in accordance with international law. Rather, it has been somewhat shy.
     

    We take this opportunity to launch an appeal to the UN and to other international bodies to act in accordance with international law and criteria in educating these people, in their rehabilitation and other related areas. The Red Cross is visiting prisons but they take Damascus as the basis. We expect them to strengthen their relationship with this Region as well.

    Question : You have citizens of Switzerland in your prisons and camps. This issue and their future is being heavily debated in the Swiss media nowadays. There are intensive arguments but the general opinion regarding their return to the country is negative. A persona non grata situation. Has there been an official or indirect attempt on the part of Switzerland on this subject ? Or have you made any attempts yourself? What is your opinion on the future of Swiss prisoners of war ?

    Mahmud : Neither Switzerland nor any other country has taken responsibility for their citizens until now. People in this region wanted a life without terror, they wanted a democratic, free, equal and peaceful way of life, just like in Switzerland. So these countries have to assume their responsibility. This community knew how to make a great sacrifice for the world. So these countries in turn cannot say, ‘we do not want to take our citizens back’. We can host an international court here. We can host a fair trial, in accordance with human rights in order to punish the terrorists. People here paid a great deal, made great sacrifices. Therefore, once more, we ask the world to take responsibility to end the terror.

    Question : Switzerland is a neutral country, especially the Geneva Canton hosts the European Headquarters of the United Nations, the International Red Cross and more than 500 international institutions and NGOs. As you know Geneva also hosts Syria’s peace negotiations. Taking all these into consideration, how can Geneva take part in the issue of the future of the prisoners of war in your custody which interests a lot of countries?

    158A1293.jpg
    Mahmud : Undoubtly the problems in Syria as well as many other issues have been discussed in Geneva. The terror problem is also an international problem.
     

    The opposition in Northern Syria should be taken into consideration in Geneva. This is an important agenda. If Geneva and the international powers do not take this responsibility, the potential for terror can be relived once again.
     

    Governments seeking status quo in the region benefit from this terror. The terrorists in our custody have the potential to serve these powers. There are powers supporting these terrorists indirectly. The AKP government in Turkey supports ISIS indirectly. The attack in Afrin almost brought our war against terror to an end. Again threats against Kobane and Rojova served to stop our war against terror. Declarations of war weakened our challenge against ISIS.
     

    These forces were helping ISIS in reorganizing and spreading their forces around the world. If Geneva does not take responsibility with its international power, this burden will be too heavy for Northern Syria to carry.
     

    ISIS can trouble the world just like it did before. The heads of this organisation have not been captured yet, el Bagdadi is still at large. This is a very serious threat, Bagdadi might have gone to Idlib.
     

    He might have gone to some other place where he can reorganize. Many of his leaders and subordinates are in our prisons. They are the ones who administered the ISIS terror, therefore the danger potential is big. If courts are not established to try and rehabilitate them they are capable of causing great danger. In this respect Geneva and the UN should seek an international response against these terorists.

    Question : What do you plan to do if no country responds to the calls or attempts you make for the trial of the prisoners ?

    158A0669.jpg

    Mahmud : We cannot say that we have not received any responses until now but we can say that we received shy responses. Some things exist at the level of discussion. But this is not sufficient. We have been left alone to face this burden until now. As I mentioned before there exists economic and legal embargos in the international arena. We only have a military relationship with the international community. This is not sufficient to hold the terrorists under control. Each country has to take up its responsibility in this matter.
     

    As per the goals of the revolution, we will fight against terrorism with all our power in order to protect our community, the communities of Northern Syria and our children. We will assume humanitarian responsibility, but we also expect the world to assume its own responsibility.  

    Undoubtedly Kurds are playing a leading role in the war against terrorism in Syria. The World has seen this, the people of the world have seen it. In the end we cooperated with the West to fight against terror. In this respect we do not owe gratitude to anyone and noone owes gratitude to us.
     

    We took this decision in accordance with our own means. It was a decision which served the world and humanity and it was realized. Just as we have fulfilled our responsibility towards humanity, no doubt the world needs to fullfill its responsibility as well. Our struggle will continue until the rights of the Kurds and other societies are accepted.
     

    Kurds have been living on this land since the beginning of history and have succeeded in protecting their existence against all forms of cruelty.

    Therefore our struggle will continue until our most basic right to rule ourselves and to live freely in our own land is guaranteed.

    Demir SÖNMEZ
    Qamichli, 17 mars 2019

    Fotoğraflar: Ersin Çaksu

     158A1811.jpg

    158A2128.jpg

    Tous droits réservés

    Aucune image ne peut être reproduite ou transmise, même partiellement, sous aucune forme, y compris l’illustration de pages web, sans avoir eu préalablement l’autorisation écrite de l’auteur. Toute violation pourra être poursuivie.
    Pour toute demande, merci de me contacter.

    www.photographygeneva.com

    Lien permanent 0 commentaire
  • Demir SÖNMEZ "une victoire pour la liberté d'expression"

    Imprimer

    Chère Madame, Cher Monsieur,

    Demir Sönmez est un photographe de presse bien connu des Genevois-es. Ses clichés figurent régulièrement dans la presse d’information, associative, politique, culturelle et syndicale.

    Il couvre la plupart des manifestations à Genève.

    Son objectif permet notamment de porter le message de celles et ceux qui se battent pour leurs droits.

    Le travail de Demir Sönmez est donc un élément important de la vie démocratique de Genève.

    Or, depuis qu'il a couvert une manifestation ayant donné lieu à une intervention musclée à l'Aéroport, Demir Sönmez fait l'objet de tracasseries policières (cf. question écrite du député Jean-Charles Rielle 423 disponible sur le site Internet du Grand Conseil http://ge.ch/grandconseil/search?search=423)

    Un tournant a eu lieu lors de la manifestation organisée par les syndicats de la fonction publique le 14 décembre 2017 devant l'Hôtel de Ville.

    Demir Sönmez a été accusé d’avoir entravé l'action de la police et a reçu une condamnation pénale du Service des contraventions.

    Il a contesté cette sanction auprès du Tribunal de police qui l’a acquitté lors d’une audience qui s’est tenue cet après-midi.

    Demir Sönmez remercie les nombreux soutiens dont il a bénéficié et se réjouit de continuer à œuvrer en faveur des droits et de la dignité humaine.

    En vous remerciant de votre attention, je vous transmets mes meilleures salutations.

    Christian Dandrès (079 738 23 66)

     

    190411_RSFCH_Communiqué Demir Sonmez.jpg

    lémanblue TV

    L'ACTIVISTE DEMIR SÖNMEZ BLANCHI

    Le 14 décembre 2017, Demir Sönmez travaillait lors d’une manifestation syndicale. Le photographe a été mis à l’écart par plusieurs policiers, car il entravait à leur action en “prenant des photographies par dessus leur épaule”, comme en témoigne le rapport.

    Cette après-midi, Demir a formé opposition contre son amende de 300 francs en paraissant au palais de justice.

    Le photographe ne comprend pas cette amende. Habitué du milieu militantiste, il voit cette bûche comme une menace pour son travail. Selon lui, son activité journalistique “dérange la police genevoise”.

    Des amis et associations syndicales sont venus le soutenir. Ils scandaient “Informer n’est pas un délit”. Pour eux, cette amende est une forme de répression, anormale à Genève.

    Il a finalement été acquitté, après plus d’une heure et demie à la barre.

    Vidéo

    http://www.lemanbleu.ch/fr/News/L-activiste-Demir-Sonmez-blanchi.html#

     

    Journal le Courrier 

    Le photographe Demir Sönmez acquitté

    https://lecourrier.ch/2019/04/11/le-photographe-demir-sonmez-acquitte/

    Lien permanent 0 commentaire
  • Journée Mondial liberté pour Lula

    Imprimer

    Environ 200 personnes se sont rassemblées sur la place des Nations Unies à Genève en faveur de La Liberté de Lula et pour le respect des Droits Humains au Brésil. Nous somme à un année d'injustice, 365 jours de prison politique pour Lula et un pays qui chaque jour s'éloigne de plus en plus des pratiques démocratiques, de la justice sociale et de l'égalité. Le Peuple de Brésil souffre, les populations les plus démunies sont de plus en plus précarisés, les violences contre les noirs, les femmes et les indigènes explosent. Le sang du peuple coule à cause des violences du gouvernement de Bolsonaro chaque jour; C’est pour cela que nous affirmons que Lula incarne l'opposition et la voix du peuple. Ils veulent nous faire taire, mais nous sommes des millions de Lula aujourd’hui et ils ne nous tairont pas notre voix.

    L1020733.jpg

    L1020759.jpg

    Acte Lula Livre -Journée Mondial Lula Livre

    Nous sommes là aujourd’hui, devant l’ONU, pour manifester contra un an de prison politique de Lula. Le 7avril 2018, le Président Lula a été arrêté et est devenu prisonnier politique après la condamnation sans preuves valables et concrètes.

    Lula a été injustement accusé et condamné pour possession présumée d'un appartement, sans aucune preuve matérielle. Cet appartement n'a jamais été utilisé par lui, il n'a jamais été le sien et il a été prouvé qu'il appartenait à une entreprise à l'époque, l'OAS.

    L'accusation de corruption qui pèse contre LULA est une autre aberration de la justice brésilienne, car selon la sentence, il s'agit de "faits indéterminés". Mais pour empêcher Lula de se présenter aux élections de 2018, tout à était permis.

    EN EFFET      Qui est Lula ?

    Métallurgiste et syndicaliste de formation, Lula était élu président du Brésil à deux reprises.

    Ses deux gouvernements ont été marqués par de grands progrès sociaux.

    Pendant ses deux mandats, le Brésil est devenu plus indépendant sur le plan international.

    Lula a été incarcéré pour des questions politiques et économiques.  La découverte d'une gigantesque réserve pétrolière, appelé PRE SAL, fruit des investissements à des recherche technologique faite par le gouvernement de LULA, a suscité l’avidité des gouvernements d’autres pays qui se sont ingérés dans les processus démocratiques du Brésil en envisageant les richesses brésiliennes. Pour avoir la possibilité de prendre les richesses du Brésil au point d’interférer dans la participation de Lula aux élections de 2018 avec son emprisonnement.  LULA EST DONC UN PRISIONER POLITIQUE !

    L’ascension au pouvoir d’un gouvernement de l'extrême droite est directement liée à la persécution et à l'emprisonnement politique de Lula. Les actes qui se succèdent le démontrent. Le juge Sérgio Moro, qui l’a persécuté et condamné, est maintenant ministre de la Justice, de ce nouveau gouvernement.

    Libérer Lula, c'est affronter les forces qui étranglent l'autonomie brésilienne et latino-américaine. C’est affronter les forces qui privent les travailleurs de leurs droits fondamentaux. C’est affronter les forces qui persécutent et menacent les dirigeants populaires non seulement au Brésil, mais aussi dans plusieurs pays d'Amérique latine.

    Libérer Lula, c'est relancer et réarticuler la lutte contre le gouvernement actuel au Brésil en défendant principalement les plus vulnérables du pays. C'est un pas fondamental vers la reprise de la démocratie au Brésil.

    TOUS ENSEMBLE POUR LULA

    LULA LIBRE

    NOBEL DE LA PAIX POUR LULA

    Comité International Lula Libre - Genève 

    L1020690.jpg

    L1020696.jpg

    L1020700.jpg

    L1020712.jpg

    L1020741.jpg

    L1020764.jpg

    L1020767.jpg

    L1020770.jpg

    L1020774.jpg

    L1020781.jpg

    L1020792.jpg

    L1020809.jpg

    L1020822.jpg

    L1020826.jpg

    L1020828.jpg

    L1020833.jpg

    Tous droits réservés

    Aucune image ne peut être reproduite ou transmise, même partiellement, sous aucune forme, y compris l’illustration de pages web, sans avoir eu préalablement l’autorisation écrite de l’auteur. Toute violation pourra être poursuivie.
    Pour toute demande, merci de me contacter.

    www.photographygeneva.com  

    Lien permanent 0 commentaire
  • Des milliers de militants de l'Etat islamique seront jugés par un tribunal international

    Imprimer

    DEM_3002.jpg

    DEM_2996.jpg

    "Tout comme nous nous sommes acquittés de notre responsabilité à l’égard de l’humanité, le monde doit aussi s’acquitter de sa responsabilité. Notre lutte continuera jusqu'à ce que les droits des Kurdes et des autres sociétés soient acceptés". Nûri Mehmûd  

    Je me suis rendu à Rojava (Kurdistan du Sud) et entretenu avec M. Nûri Mehmûd, porte-parole du YPG (Yekîneyên Parastina Gel – Brigades de Protection du Peuple) à propos de l'avenir des prisonniers de guerre d'origines suisses et européennes qui ont combattu dans les rangs de djihadistes. Lors de mon entretien, je lui ai demandé comment il voyait le jugement de ces prisonniers détenus par le YPG : « selon vous, où, comment, par qui, avec quelles lois et par quel tribunal ces prisonniers de guerre pourraient être jugés équitablement ? » 

    J'ai eu un entretien de 35 minutes avec M. Nûri Mehmûd du 17 mars 2019 à Qamichli  au Rojawa (Syrie). Enregistrement vidéo disponible. Si cela vous intéresse, j'attends vos suggestions. 

    Nûri Mehmûd a répondu aux questions suivante :

    Combien de prisonniers de guerre et combien de leurs familles sont détenus dans des camps ? Ensemble, ces derniers représentent combien de nationalités 

    Les États d'origines de ces prisonniers de guerre ont-ils fait des démarches auprès de vous ? Si oui, lesquelles ?

    Combien d'États sont intervenus jusqu'ici pour récupérer leurs ressortissants ?

    Comme vous le savez, plusieurs États ne souhaitent pas récupérer leurs ressortissants détenus ici. Cela est devenu une crise internationale. C'est très grave. Ainsi, certains États ont totalement abandonné leurs ressortissants. Comment analysez-vous cette situation ? Avez vous des projets pour surmonter cette crise ?

    Il y a des allégations sérieuses sur la commission des crimes de guerre et des crimes contre l'humanité à l'égard des prisonniers de guerre que vous détenez. À votre avis, où, comment, par qui, avec quelles lois et par quel tribunal ces prisonniers de guerre pourraient être jugés équitablement ? Pourriez-vous partager avec nous votre analyse et propositions sur ce sujet ?

    Vous détenez des prisonniers de guerre. De ce fait, ces derniers ont des droits, conformément au droit international humanitaire. Pour le moment, c'est vous qui assurez leurs besoins essentiels (logement, alimentation, soin de santé, communication, etc.). Cela représente des dépenses importantes. Comment faites-vous pour couvrir ces dépenses ? À ce propos, recevez-vous des soutiens financiers des institutions internationales ? Ou, avez-vous solliciter le soutien de la Croix-Rouge ou le Croissant-Rouge ? 

    Parmi les prisonniers de guerre que vous détenez figurent des citoyens suisses. Il y a d'intenses débats dans les médias suisses sur le sort de ces derniers. L'opinion publique suisse semble être plutôt contre la venue de ces personnes en Suisse. Est-ce que les autorités suisses, de  manière directe ou indirecte, sont intervenues auprès de vous concernant ces prisonniers de guerre ? Ou bien, vous-même, êtes-vous intervenu auprès du gouvernement suisse ? Quel est votre avis et quelles sont vos propositions concernant le sort des ressortissants suisses détenus ici ?

    Une dernière question. La Suisse est un État neutre et le Canton de Genève abrite non seulement le siège européen de l'ONU mais aussi le siège de la Croix-Rouge internationale et plus de 500 ONG. Tenant compte de ces éléments, selon vous, quel rôle pourrait jouer la Suisse et le Canton de Genève en particulier sur le sort des prisonniers de guerre qui concernent plusieurs États.

    158A0669.jpg

    158A1293.jpg

    158A1804.jpg

    158A1811.jpg

    158A2128.jpg

    Photos:Ersin Çaksu

     

    Lien permanent 0 commentaire